Former HELLOWEEN Frontman KISKE Debates Worthiness Of Music Reviews
June 20, 2006One of heavy metal's most talented and outspoken singers, ex-HELLOWEEN frontman Michael Kiske, recently interviewed with Hardrock Haven's Derric Miller. Miller also went on to review Kiske's new solo album. Upon completing the review, Miller sent it on to Kiske, and what followed was a series of e-mails in which Miller and Kiske debated, discussed, deconstructed and dissected each other's philosophies on the worthiness of music reviews.
Here is an excerpt from the discourse:
Kiske: The modern attitude of press and media causes lots of damage to freedom of thinking and true culture today in my eyes. It only builds prejudice and makes true music more and impossible and very hard to reach people. This is all just general! Not so much targeting at you personally! But important issues!
"Like I said, I disagree with many things today that are considered as 'right.' I can't stand reviews most of the time because the 'good-tone' of journalists is too often plain arrogance. Critics act and write most of the time as 'music popes.' And I don't believe in popes...
Here is another excerpt:
Miller: "I disagree with you about one thing, though. You said: 'He (the reviewer) should be very positive! And if he can't, he shouldn't write about it!'
"I can't agree with this. In essence, if the only reviews written were glowing, effusive, all-praising reviews ... what would be the point? Why would anyone ever read a review, since they are all going to say, 'This is the best thing I've ever heard!' To me, this means music reviewers aren't a 'necessary evil' ... they aren't even necessary!
Kiske: "Good thought though, but they could to a much healthier job for our music-culture by being less Popes and more artistic and cultural."
To read the entire series of e-mails, visit www.hardrockhaven.net.
Comments Disclaimer And Information